Leaderboard

I know ya'll have seen this pic before, but in the spirit of this thread I'll share once again. Marv built and sprayed my #1 (H-525 Custom) that includes his 50's stye thick neck carve. Man, I love this beast of a guitar!

I have found Lollar's P-90s to vary from set to set and also to sound better in different guitars. I loved the Lollar P-90s in the 535 P90 guitar I sold to Daniel Rockabilly and the Lollar p-90s that came in my Collings gold top City Limits. I tried a couple different sets of P-90s in the Collings, and to my surprise the Lollars sounded the best. My personal favorite P-90s are the Throbak '52/'54 P-90s with plenty of grit and growl. But Throbak's prices have really increased since the pandemic and they are quite an investment now.

Old H-140s are fun guitars. I've got an '87, changed out the pickups to SD Alnico Pro IIs because there was a problem with the originals. I think I tried changing caps, but that didn't help. The jack had to be replaced a few years back. Other than that mine is original. It's been back to K'zoo a few times over the years for PSP, including PSP 2023. Yours has a nice looking top!

This one does not have a huge neck. Very comfortable medium C.

I keep thinking about a Jazz box. My guitar teacher has a Herb Ellis and I keep thinking "maybe I should have one of those". I'd probably only put 11's on it, as somehow I think i'd end up also playing more blues stuff on it. Man these are some nice looking guitars in here.

Since we are sharing H550 pics....My 550.

Right. Very little bending in my playing. Slides, and hammer on, yes, but almost no bends.

And he continued on to answer such a basic question. Every guitar player I interact with consider your query fundamental. It has been addressed here multiple times which is precisely why I wholeheartedly agree with bolero’s frustrations. Sit back, take a deep breath and consider thanking him for sharing his knowledge and experiences. You got far more than you paid for.

Ni!!

Make it a nice one. Not too big or ostentatious

There are loads of discussion threads that "debate" the concept. What Bolero said is part of the equation. The difference in cabinet size will alter the frequency response of the system, which might affect how you perceive the sound. Mathematically, if you put 1 watt into a 100dB efficient speaker, you get 100dB. If you put 1 watt into 4 100dB speakers wired to the same impedance, each speaker will get 0.25 watts. Thus each speaker will be putting out 94dB (3dB for halving the power, 3dB for halving THAT power.) But then you had 4 times that 94dB and you get back to 100dB. The difference will be more in tonal balance that actual sound intensity, which might be measured at 1 frequency. I've seen discussions where they say the increase was larger with 2 speakers rather than one, but the problem with this is that the impedance won't be the same between a single and a dual speaker setup. If you have a pair of 8 ohm speakers, and only use one, it's 8 ohms. If you add the second in parallel, it's now 4 ohms, so your power usage is different at the "same setting". Put them in series and you have 16 ohms, which could lower your output. When you use a 4x cabinet, with two in series and the series in parallel, the impedance can be the same as a single speaker. Identical power is distributed evenly. Jim Lill did a Youtube video where he compared lots of difference cab configurations and how it affected the sound. It may not change the dB reading but it changes the perception of the sound.

I was being serious. If you are offended that isn't my fault, it wasn't my intention either. You are reading far too much into that statement. I would have said exactly the same thing to any friend I was having that discussion with. Not only that, but I went to the effort of additional details that likely affect your perception of sound & volume. You are welcome.