HANGAR18

It is time for Rolling Thunder again (tomorrow). Kinda like the Superbowl of motorcycles for the Washington DC area. This is where half a million motorcycles from around this country, Canada and other countries as well descend upon our nation's capital for "The Ride to the Wall". Meaning we ride as an organized group to the Vietnam Veteran's memorial in Washington DC. The event is a protest, a demonstration with the point being that we remember those who served our country during a time of war and never returned home, and to demand that our government achieve 100% accountability of all those who are prisoner of war (POW's), missing in action (MIA's). Even now, Sgt. Bowe R. Bergdahl was captured in 2009 and is American's only known living Prisoner of War in Afghanistan. We remember our soldiers and we want them returned to us.

Is there a number 2 on the back of the headstock?

SRV is said to have used some REALLY fat strings and legend has it that those fat strings contributed to the tone he got out of his guitar. Zakk Wylde signature strings are so fat that they are practically bass guitar strings and the nut of the guitar needs to be re-cut so that they will fit. (been there, done that.) Dave Mustaine, Alex Skolnick... the list goes on; the names of guys who are said to be playing some REALLY fat strings on their electric guitars. But are the benefits of fat strings simply an urban myth? Over and over lately I have been running across video interviews where Billy Gibbons of ZZ Top has been telling and re-telling the story of how he met BB King who asked him, something like, "Man, why are you working so hard?" implying that those really fat strings make the guitar player work much harder than he should have to. So, Billy Gibbons took that advise to heart and begun to install thinner and thinner strings on his guitars. Right now he is down to 7's on his guitars. I've seen many recent performances by Billy Gibbons and I would have never guessed that he had such thin strings on his guitars. So my question to myself now is, Do I dare go to thinner strings on my guitar? Will people question my manliness if I were to install 9's on my big fat Heritage H157? Or 8's on my big beefy Les Paul? Would it be cheating to have a guitar that plays even more effortless than it already does now? If I ever do interviews for Guitar Player magazine, do I have to tell everyone if I am using teeny-tiny strings or do I just tell them that I've got a really big fat E string when in fact I really have a little tiny e string? Oh the humanity! Decisions, decisions! What to do!?

There is where I try to think of something which does not qualify as material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law.

This entry is clearly a hit and run post since the poster posted this the same day he joined and hasn't logged in ever since.

The Heritage Guitar company will not see this massage here. Contact the Heritage dealer you bought it from to express your complaint and see if they can fix it or just return it for a refund.

Heritage Guitar, the namesake of this owners club, began in 1985/1986. Therefore, the instruments you are describing are not related to THESE Heritage guitars.

Oh good; I was hoping you now owned a H535 or H555 after having been a fan of the 335.