GuitArtMan Posted September 28, 2007 Posted September 28, 2007 In my experience Heritage's hollow bodies and semi-hollow bodies have been consistently lighter and more resonant than their G word counterparts. However, their solid bodies have consistently been boat anchors, as heavy as the heaviest G word counterparts. I don't get it. ???
PacerX Posted September 28, 2007 Posted September 28, 2007 In my experience Heritage's hollow bodies and semi-hollow bodies have been consistently lighter and more resonant than their G word counterparts. However, their solid bodies have consistently been boat anchors, as heavy as the heaviest G word counterparts. I don't get it. ??? I'm in the "heavier is better" camp where Les Paul style solidbodies are concerned, so me likey.
dblazer Posted September 28, 2007 Posted September 28, 2007 The semi and hollow body guitars are mostly curly maple or other woods rather than Honduras mahogany. The H-150 I had weighed 13.5 lbs, it was the biggest, heaviest chunk of mahogany that I'd ever seen that wasn't part of a boat. Sounded great, spectacular neck/fingerboard, but "Two Ton Tony" just HAD to go. My H-140 weighs about 7.5 lbs and sounds better, probably because the H-150 had the Schaller P/Us and the H-140 has Seymour/Seth P.A.F.s.
Thundersteel Posted September 28, 2007 Posted September 28, 2007 The last new H150 I played weighed 9 pounds; it was very light compared to my LP & H157.
golferwave Posted September 28, 2007 Posted September 28, 2007 I also had an H-150CM that was a battleship anchor and had to go. In discussions with Jay he told me that for a while Heritage experimented with African mahogany like the Gbrand uses & got back to Honduran because it's lighter and more resonant. It's also more expensive. All of the H-150's I have now are right at the 9 lb mark and sound great.
GuitArtMan Posted September 28, 2007 Author Posted September 28, 2007 I'm in the "heavier is better" camp where Les Paul style solidbodies are concerned, so me likey. Not me at all. I had a moment of epiphany with a real '56 Gold Top that I will never forget. The thing couldn't have weighed more the 7.5 lbs, resonant as hell, sustain for days, and P90 tone from Heaven. In fact I would have to say of all the vintage Gibson’s (‘50s and early ‘60s) I have played most if not all were feather weight by today’s standards. I don’t buy into the BS that a guitar has to weigh a ton to sustain well – I think that’s the biggest BS that’s been marketed and has not been my experience at all. Almost to a one (if not to a one) the finest vintage instruments I have played were very light and resonant and still sustained extremely well.
GuitArtMan Posted September 28, 2007 Author Posted September 28, 2007 I also had an H-150CM that was a battleship anchor and had to go. In discussions with Jay he told me that for a while Heritage experimented with African mahogany like the Gbrand uses & got back to Honduran because it's lighter and more resonant. It's also more expensive. All of the H-150's I have now are right at the 9 lb mark and sound great. Wierd. I have a one-piece Mahogany strat body that I bought from Warmoth that weighs in at a svelt 3.0 lbs and is resonant as hell, and no it's not chambered. Warmoth advertises that they use African Mahogany.
grayta Posted September 28, 2007 Posted September 28, 2007 Yeah, I've found there's really no correlation with weight and tone. I had a 150 that was a whopping 12 lbs-sounded great but that's too dang heavy. I've had LPs at 8lbs that sounded just as good. My 535 clocks in at a petite 7.
PacerX Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 Not me at all. I had a moment of epiphany with a real '56 Gold Top that I will never forget. The thing couldn't have weighed more the 7.5 lbs, resonant as hell, sustain for days, and P90 tone from Heaven. In fact I would have to say of all the vintage Gibson’s (‘50s and early ‘60s) I have played most if not all were feather weight by today’s standards. I don’t buy into the BS that a guitar has to weigh a ton to sustain well – I think that’s the biggest BS that’s been marketed and has not been my experience at all. Almost to a one (if not to a one) the finest vintage instruments I have played were very light and resonant and still sustained extremely well. Hmmmm... This is interesting. I can see where you're coming from... and might be inclined to believe that the setup of the issue is #1 to the equation... but, oddly enough (and maybe it's just a limited experience in LP-style guitars that I've lived with - a total of 3 in my life), the heavier guitars seem to "chunk" more and sustain better. Maybe I should try a featherwieght out and see what happens.
doggy1972 Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 I think weight definately thickens tone. Think 70s Yamaha SG. Those things weigh a ton. Very thick tones. Although the brass sustain block helped. Wonder why more makers dont use them?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.