Jump to content
Heritage Owners Club

The H155 Heritage Millennium: f-Holes, Yes or No?


HANGAR18

Recommended Posts

Posted

The H155 Heritage Millennium model guitar. Also known as the "Millie". Listed in the semi-hollow body section of the Heritage web site but many of us know that the guitar is better known as a semi-solid body guitar and an exclusive Heritage guitar invention.

 

So my question is which do you prefer and why... f-holes? or no f-holes? (See examples of both below.)

Personal opinions and scientific fact are both welcome.

 

I'm kicking around the idea of actually buying a guitar in 2015 which is light for a change and this is where I am at the moment.

 

 

Mill%20Ultra%20STD%20VO.jpg

 

Mill%20H155%20TB%20Blk.jpg

Posted

I kinda like 'em without. Altho' honestly, without the f-holes I think mine sounds and feels more like a double cut H150 than a Millie. And having had mine without the f-holes, I think if you want the true Millennium experience, it should have them.

 

millie2008-fullfront1.jpg

 

 

Posted

F-holes on a Millie?!

 

 

 

 

Why? Probably just because mine doesn't have them, and I dig it. I have enough guitars with the holes, I kind of like the solid look of my H-155. They are cool either way.

Posted

I know they aren't Heritages, but I had G&L Bluesboys both with and without the f-hole. The f-hole really helps accentuate the semi-hollow construction of that guitar. There definitely is a tonal difference. Either way, the Millie sure looks sweet!

Posted

A Millennium Pro (like Skydog52) WITH F-holes would be my choice.

 

That would be the closest Heritage to my favorite guitar from Gibson, the Johnny A. Signature.post-8-0-73372100-1404223043_thumb.jpg

Posted

No F-Holes on this DC Millie because the top is spruce with a flame Maple back. Less pressure points to cause stress on this fragile top.
I'm pretty sure there will be no more spruce Millies. I like the look either way.

post-676-0-60545000-1404225972_thumb.jpg

post-676-0-09135500-1404226011_thumb.jpg

Posted

If it were me, and since I have Solidbody single cut guitars, I would definitely go WITH the F holes for different tonal pallet.

Posted

One more vote for the f-holes, just for the classy looks. I've never tried one without but it seems there is a difference in sound. Maybe that should be the deciding factor.

 

That spruce top millie looks awesome, by the way!

Posted

Here's my list:) ....no F holes, nickel hardware (I can't deal with gold), H tailpiece, sunburst, big fat flame, throbak pickups, and waverly tuners. And I think a nice three or five piece flame maple neck for stiffness.

Posted

I am a huge fan of semi-hollow guitars. I like the "breath of air" under the tone I don't get with a solid body guitar. So, to maximize that I'd say go WITH the F-Holes.

Posted

One thing that has not been mentioned in this thread is that Millies have SOLID TOPS. They respond sonically closer to a solid body guitar than a semi-hollow or hollow bodied instrument. So F-holes on it will not be quite as airy as a laminate top 535 or Prospect.

Posted

One thing that has not been mentioned in this thread is that Millies have SOLID TOPS. They respond sonically closer to a solid body guitar than a semi-hollow or hollow bodied instrument. So F-holes on it will not be quite as airy as a laminate top 535 or Prospect.

Your comment got me out of my chair to check the thickness of my laminate top H535 and carved top Millie. I used a caliper at each f-hole and found the 535 to be .200 inch, and the Millie was .225 inch thick. Not really a lot of difference except that the H535 is larger and will therefore have a larger chamber.

 

Even so, laminates are sandwiched in a way to make them structurally stronger, not necessarily more resonate. Do we need to re-think our assumptions regarding semi-hollow v. semi-solid?

Posted

I like both and have both. So just order two. Wish you lived closer Danny you could test drive mine all you like!

post-194-0-44018000-1404246452_thumb.jpg

Posted

I have one of each, recently got one with F holes. For classic rock, skip the f holes. for blues, early rock, jazz, f holes do have a slight acoustic property although it is still probably closer to a 150. Love to show off my Millies, here is a couple of recent videos for comparision, one rock setting two guitar band, the other blues club. hope it helps

 

Millie without F-Holes. Much better for classic rock. No feedback. Still gets a great jazz sound from the neck pickup (hollow underneath). Wood really pops without the FHOLEs can compete with a Marshall

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4l7363aGRo

 

Millie with F-Holes. Great for blues, could not play in my band setting. Have to get some dougs plugs for the fholes. Not a very musical feedback when it does feedback. I actually like the feedback produced by the non Fhole millie

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBSSLLVRqbM

 

I love the blues sound/early rock I get with my millie with fholes straight into the pro junior.

For the two guitar band competing with a marshall, I could not tame the f-hole millie

 

Hopefully this helps.

Posted

One thing that has not been mentioned in this thread is that Millies have SOLID TOPS. They respond sonically closer to a solid body guitar than a semi-hollow or hollow bodied instrument. So F-holes on it will not be quite as airy as a laminate top 535 or Prospect.

 

some millies have laminate tops

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...