bolero Posted February 5 Posted February 5 Anybody else get the notification about H-555's being back on the menu? They look good: https://heritageguitars.com/pages/core-collection-h-555 1
V23505 Posted February 5 Posted February 5 I was very happy to see this. I had a custom-order 2015 in faded cherry, which I stupidly sold, and very much miss. It was a great guitar, and I've every confidence the new version will be as good. GAS officially triggered here! 1
DetroitBlues Posted February 5 Posted February 5 (edited) I’m glad they brought them back. Expensive, but that’s not surprising. Using the same custom shop hot Alnico 5 pickups as the H157’s. Love it! Edited February 5 by DetroitBlues
Gitfiddler Posted February 5 Posted February 5 Awesome! I pulled my 2007 H555 out for a quick comparison In addition to the new larger headstock shape, these new H555's have 5-ply binding around the body (one more than previous models), and 3-ply around the headstock (2 more than before). Interestingly, the f-holes are now unbound. Still, I'm glad to see Heritage bring back its blingy triple nickel semi-hollow. Here's my '07... 1
skydog52 Posted February 5 Posted February 5 (edited) I was a little disappointed. I always loved the inlays and binding everywhere. This is a H-555 Edited February 5 by skydog52 1
DetroitBlues Posted February 6 Posted February 6 5 hours ago, Gitfiddler said: Awesome! I pulled my 2007 H555 out for a quick comparison In addition to the new larger headstock shape, these new H555's have 5-ply binding around the body (one more than previous models), and 3-ply around the headstock (2 more than before). Interestingly, the f-holes are now unbound. Still, I'm glad to see Heritage bring back its blingy triple nickel semi-hollow. Here's my '07... I wonder if the F Hole being unbound was an oversight?
DetroitBlues Posted February 6 Posted February 6 5 hours ago, skydog52 said: I was a little disappointed. I always loved the inlays and binding everywhere. This is a H-555 I had just about forgotten what the OG’s looked like.
bolero Posted February 6 Author Posted February 6 I like them but always thought it was weird they used block inlays higher up on the neck. If they'd pointed them at the ends like a spear instead of square, it'd look better & match the rest IMO. I think these look good with the blocks I also like the bound F holes, it pops the shapes out of the darkness. Didn't the originals have maple necks too? That was something else that set them apart from the 535 1
pressure Posted February 6 Posted February 6 You mean like this Millie. My first Heritage Custom Shop build from 2011. 3 1
TalismanRich Posted February 7 Posted February 7 4 hours ago, bolero said: Didn't the originals have maple necks too? That was something else that set them apart from the 535 Originally, the 555s had 3 piece maple necks, but I think that changed in later years. The 2005 catalog still says 3 piece maple neck with ebony fingerboard.\
Spectrum13 Posted February 7 Posted February 7 3 hours ago, pressure said: You mean like this Millie. My first Heritage Custom Shop build from 2011. Your builds were stellar, so well thought out and tasty 1
golferwave Posted February 7 Posted February 7 5 hours ago, pressure said: You mean like this Millie. My first Heritage Custom Shop build from 2011. That is an incredible guitar. Pride of ownership in all of your custom builds.
JeffB Posted February 7 Posted February 7 I really like the OG inlays and F hole binding. I think they were beautiful looking guitars. Im sure the new ones will be great guitars, I just like the original aesthetics more. 1
DetroitBlues Posted February 7 Posted February 7 Guess there was a lot of cost saving measures here to bring back the 555. Easier inlays, regular mahogany necks, no bound F-Holes. They've made them closer to the G brand design that OG Heritage design. This is pound for pound a direct copy of the ES-355 Gibson makes today. Mahogany neck, unbound F-hole, and full block inlays. Other than artist models, the newest ES-355 does not have a stereo output or varitone selector. I did make a comment that Heritage missed the opportunity to use a bound Tortise pickguard instead of solid bound black.
TalismanRich Posted February 7 Posted February 7 7 minutes ago, DetroitBlues said: Guess there was a lot of cost saving measures here to bring back the 555. At $4800, I don't think there needs to be a lot of cost saving. Certainly not the lack of bound f-holes. They could have done a single binding there. That said, I wouldn't leave it sitting in the case just for having them unbound. Something that I've always wondered is if a 3 or 5 piece neck is more stable than one piece mahogany, in terms of twisting or even needing less adjustment. 1 1
DavesNotHere Posted February 7 Posted February 7 On 2/5/2025 at 2:09 PM, skydog52 said: I was a little disappointed. I always loved the inlays and binding everywhere. This is a H-555 Agreed. 1
DetroitBlues Posted February 7 Posted February 7 3 hours ago, TalismanRich said: At $4800, I don't think there needs to be a lot of cost saving. Certainly not the lack of bound f-holes. They could have done a single binding there. That said, I wouldn't leave it sitting in the case just for having them unbound. Something that I've always wondered is if a 3 or 5 piece neck is more stable than one piece mahogany, in terms of twisting or even needing less adjustment. How much more does it cost to make a 555 over a 535? Little extra binding and inlay work. Cost savings over previous design. No laminated 3/5 piece necks, no small split diamond/arrow inlay work. No binding on the f-holes (I've been told that was a very difficult process)
Spectrum13 Posted February 7 Posted February 7 2 hours ago, DetroitBlues said: How much more does it cost to make a 555 over a 535? Little extra binding and inlay work. It's bling Josh! Reminds me of what dads told us in the 60's and 70's about choosing a muscle car. If you want the big horses, you got to feed them. 1
pressure Posted February 7 Posted February 7 8 hours ago, TalismanRich said: omething that I've always wondered is if a 3 or 5 piece neck is more stable than one piece mahogany, in terms of twisting or even needing less adjustment. I have asked that question myself and have not gotten an answer. For what it's worth Heritage 5-piece necks need truss rod adjustments.
bolero Posted February 8 Author Posted February 8 On 2/6/2025 at 6:52 PM, pressure said: You mean like this Millie. My first Heritage Custom Shop build from 2011. Ohh....you have impeccable taste, my friend! 1
DetroitBlues Posted February 10 Posted February 10 On 2/7/2025 at 6:12 PM, pressure said: I have asked that question myself and have not gotten an answer. For what it's worth Heritage 5-piece necks need truss rod adjustments. I've more or less was thinking the multi-ply necks meant less chance of a headstock break.
MartyGrass Posted February 10 Posted February 10 The old H-555s had maple necks. Some were single pieced and some were multiple. 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now