Jump to content
Heritage Owners Club

Looking For Advice


parrhesia

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello fellow Heritage owners,

 

Very excited about this site, which I just joined. I'm a little intimidated by how knowledgeable everybody is compared to me, but oh well.

 

I have a 1987 Heritage solid-body electric guitar. Not exactly sure which model it is-- possible an H-150? It's a Les Paul with a pretty sunburst color body. I've owned it since I was in high school in the early 1990's and still play it every chance I get.

 

One small problem: it came with a chrome roller bridge that I liked, but it's currently missing a saddle for the 1st string. Anybody know how to find a single roller saddle replacement and avoid buying a new bridge?

Posted
Hello fellow Heritage owners,

 

Very excited about this site, which I just joined. I'm a little intimidated by how knowledgeable everybody is compared to me, but oh well.

 

I have a 1987 Heritage solid-body electric guitar. Not exactly sure which model it is-- possible an H-150? It's a Les Paul with a pretty sunburst color body. I've owned it since I was in high school in the early 1990's and still play it every chance I get.

 

One small problem: it came with a chrome roller bridge that I liked, but it's currently missing a saddle for the 1st string. Anybody know how to find a single roller saddle replacement and avoid buying a new bridge?

 

 

i have some extra saddles laying around...are you talking about just the wheel and threaded piece that the string sets on?

 

shoot me your address and i'll send 1 to ya

 

IMG_1035.jpg

Posted

I've noticed that a lot of people take off the roller bridge, and instead put on a Nashville-style TOM. Heritage also seems to have gone away from that design. Why no love for the roller bridge? isn't it more customizable than the other TOM's due to the adjustable string spacing? Or is it a tone issue?

 

also, what about that big bad tailpiece?

Posted

i love the Schaller hardwar...always have and have not noticed any significant difference between the 2 styles as far as tone or anything else

Posted
I've noticed that a lot of people take off the roller bridge, and instead put on a Nashville-style TOM. Heritage also seems to have gone away from that design. Why no love for the roller bridge? isn't it more customizable than the other TOM's due to the adjustable string spacing? Or is it a tone issue?

 

also, what about that big bad tailpiece?

 

 

Jay says that the roller bridge affects sustain in a negative way. The one great thing about the roller bridge is no string breakage. I can do without the big tailpiece but others like it ok. Each person has their preference.

Posted
Jay says that the roller bridge affects sustain in a negative way. The one great thing about the roller bridge is no string breakage. I can do without the big tailpiece but others like it ok. Each person has their preference.

 

This is true Seymour Duncan did a study (not just a "by ear" study, but an actual oscillation scientific study) that showed something like 22 or 24% more sustain with the Nashville bridge. This is why Jay Wolfe only orders his Heritage's with Nashville hardware. Then after several years, everyone (except Brent :) ) kind of just adapted and ordered them that way.

Posted

well... I would see how that's true... also explains why the sustain on Kahlers tremolos is known for being bad: too many rollers isolating the sound from the guitar body. My heritage most likely originally came with a roller bridge. I also have the big bad tailpiece, but someone replaced it with a supposed vintage GIbson stoptail. I am pretty sure next time It's in for a setup, I'm gonna have my guy pull the bushings and put the big thing back on.

Posted

I replaced the roller bridge on my H-550 with a Nashville style TOM and am pleased with the results. To my ear, the strings ring clearer and less vibration is transmitted to the portion of the strings between the bridge and tailpiece. I suppose that equates to better sustain. I think it looks nicer too.

 

My $0.02 ($0.015 after taxes)

Posted

I just converted my 2 H140s to Schaller Nashville bridges and vintage style tailpieces. Much better than stock.

I have a Schaller Big Tailpiece available in the marketplace.

Posted

My 140 is a straight stock Schaller set up..It sounds great, but I've never listened to one that was converted to the T.O.M,..I like being able to adjust the string spacing on the Schaller, though..It's really easy..

Posted

Much appreciated:

 

Nat Worden

94 Fern Avenue

Litchfield, CT 06759

 

i have some extra saddles laying around...are you talking about just the wheel and threaded piece that the string sets on?

 

shoot me your address and i'll send 1 to ya

 

IMG_1035.jpg

Posted

quick question: is the schaller roller bridge that Heritage uses the same one that stewart macdonald sells? http://www.stewmac.com/shop/Bridges,_tailp...ler_Bridge.html

 

I'm thinking about putting the heritage completely back to stock. I'll always have the Grover tom if I really noticed a sustain decrease. Just... it's a heritage, and I want it to look like a heritage.

Posted

I can't really tell a difference in tone between the Tom or the Schaller stuff. I do prefer the look of the Tom type. Welcome and can we see some pics? It's cool you've owned it for so long. We want to see it!!!

Posted
i have some extra saddles laying around...are you talking about just the wheel and threaded piece that the string sets on?

 

shoot me your address and i'll send 1 to ya

 

IMG_1035.jpg

now thats what the hoc is all about

Posted
This is true Seymour Duncan did a study (not just a "by ear" study, but an actual oscillation scientific study) that showed something like 22 or 24% more sustain with the Nashville bridge. This is why Jay Wolfe only orders his Heritage's with Nashville hardware. Then after several years, everyone (except Brent :lol: ) kind of just adapted and ordered them that way.

 

A quarter more? While that's impressive, that doesn't strike me as a useful trait.

 

When I first started playing my Heritage 535 I found it necessary to end the natural sustain and decay of the finishing chord/note by doing the ever anoying "double chop." The song's over, this sustain is cool as a guitar player, but going on a bit long for the audience's comfort, double chop. Song done, awkwardness finished. Next song.

 

Is it sustain in the usual sense? That is, the amount of time we hear the note decaying? Or is it useful sustain, the amount of time you can usefully maintain a clear note before it falls out of the band's volume level?

 

I'm interested in learning more about that study. If you're able, please post a link.

Posted
quick question: is the schaller roller bridge that Heritage uses the same one that stewart macdonald sells? http://www.stewmac.com/shop/Bridges,_tailp...ler_Bridge.html

 

I'm thinking about putting the heritage completely back to stock. I'll always have the Grover tom if I really noticed a sustain decrease. Just... it's a heritage, and I want it to look like a heritage.

 

 

i think they are pretty much the same

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
This is true Seymour Duncan did a study (not just a "by ear" study, but an actual oscillation scientific study) that showed something like 22 or 24% more sustain with the Nashville bridge. This is why Jay Wolfe only orders his Heritage's with Nashville hardware. Then after several years, everyone (except Brent :blush: ) kind of just adapted and ordered them that way.

I wonder what that test would show for the loss that occurs with a ply topped guitar as oppposed to a solid wood top?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...